Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilli Moon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gilli Moon[edit]

Gilli Moon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Might be a speedy deletion candidate? Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lots of coverage of her book Just Get Out There in the media section of her website, but it's not the type we consider reliable sources, rather blogs, unpublished quotes from individuals, etc.. not the normal book reviews in reliable secondary sources (newspapers, magazines etc). -- GreenC 04:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I don't see that she meets WP:MUSIC, nor do I think the book meets WP:BK. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with the views expressed above. Finnegas (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.