Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon (Charmed)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Charmed characters. Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap czar 08:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gideon (Charmed)[edit]

Gideon (Charmed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) –

Delete as they all fail WP:FICT, WP:NOTE and WP:RS (View log)

Triad (Charmed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Source (Charmed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Avatars (Charmed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zankou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Patty Halliwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Penny Halliwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Melinda Warren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Hollow (Charmed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Aoba47 (talk) 07:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 07:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ebyabe: I was the one that expanded and improved the Kyra article, but I do not believe that any of these articles have enough independent and reliable sources to achieve a similar expansion. While all of these characters are very notable on the show, I do not believe they can achieve notability outside of the show. I do understand however if people are hesitant about deleting a large list of articles, but I thought it might be helpful to address them all as a group. Aoba47 (talk) 20:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There's nothing to establish notability, so individual articles are not necessary. Redirecting is also an option. TTN (talk) 20:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.