Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibson Byrd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, taking into consideration edits by Johnbod after this article was nominated. Daniel (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson Byrd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Notability (people) standard. Also, the only reference is an "Artist's profile," which only contains a short, three-paragraph blurb about the artist's life, and a list of the 6 exhibitions the artist participated in. Josh3580_talk/hist 14:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added a collections section, using this. There is also this from 1988 and a bit more on google. Meets WP:ARTIST 4 d) "is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums", just. Johnbod (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has held significant exhibitions. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ARTIST #4 (in collection of multiple notable museums — see the two bluelinked museums in the article). The newspaper obit and review of his retrospective would also seem to be enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.