Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostgirl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 20:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ghostgirl[edit]
- Ghostgirl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No real claim is made for this website's notability other than the fact that is the brainchild of someone "acclaimed" - the give-away that something is awry here is that the main editor seems to works under a username suggesting they are the aforesaid "acclaimee". There's some crystal balling that a book will be published in the future. And there is a sort of claim of notability-by-association - it can be accessed via AOL, apparently, and they have loads of visitors. But do not despair, if you follow the links, you'll find an offer of "Clothes, books and merchandise to die for!" TwoMightyGodsPersuasionNecessity 16:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable website. JIP | Talk 17:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A clear-cut case of lack of notability. Could've been prodded, although perhaps the [apparently dedicated] author would've deleted that quickly. —Switchercat talkcont 20:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I clicked the link, and America Online does in fact have a website catering to teens, and is in fact hosting Ghost Girl. The article reads, "Ms. Hurley also partnered with America Online in October 2006 to launch www.ghostgirlonred.com an exclusive site on AOL’s RED teen portal, a web destination visited by million of teens each month." It doesn't say how many hits this particular site gets though. America Online apparently felt it was notable, since they let her into their exclusive site seen by millions each month. I see no reason to delete it. Dream Focus (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable website. Even number of visitors wouldn't make a difference, if it hasn't been noted (hence notable) in multiple independant RS. Don't AOL host anyone that pays? Yobmod (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not every website needs an article. Not notable at all. S. Dean Jameson 15:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.