Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex#Video games. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - Online[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This recently created article just duplicates information found at Ghost in the Shell#Stand Alone Complex and Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex#Video games. It also previously featured a reference that pointed to a link that did not actually exist, representing the statement now identified with a {{fact}} tag. There are not enough references and there is not enough information to support a separate article at this time. This needs to be turned into a redirect, preferrably to the Stand Alone Complex page. —Ryulong (琉竜) 14:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why not simply redirect the article then.--70.49.82.207 (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did and it was reverted.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unneeded forking. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 18:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ghost_in_the_Shell#Stand_Alone_Complex. Merge at this point is possible but not preferred, because of WP:CRYSTAL. Ansh6 6 6 03:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I think the actual Stand Alone Complex page is better. We should not have the information in so many places.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right. So confusing already... Ansh6 6 6 06:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.