Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Dragon of Cold Mountain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Dragon of Cold Mountain[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was listed as Prod as no sign of notability, delisted from this by article creator after an edit that did not appear to make it noteable. Bringing it here for consideration. Amortias (T)(C) 10:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep seems like it should be notable. Thinly sourced but it's still a month from starting; coverage should pick up closer to and after it starts. Noticed zh.wp has a much more developed article (though no better sourced) so linked it to this one.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added two refs to establish notability. Definitely beyond production so not a future release. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Philg88 ^♦talk 05:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as sources added by Philg88, The article needs alot of improving tho!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 07:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Stubbish right now though given both that it′s a series from a major network (TVB) and the pre-broadcast coverage it′s had in the press, coverage should increase once it broadcasts. This fan blog [1] gives details sourced from Apple Daily′s commentary (from this, I think?) for instance. Similarly this fan forum [2] has placemarker threads for ratings data, interviews, and magazine scans covering it; once it starts they may be useful for finding the original sources or even prove useful as convenience links. --91.125.29.135 (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.