Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Characters Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 21:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ghost Characters Theory[edit]
- Ghost Characters Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable theory. No references given, zero hits on Google Scholar for either it or its creator. Fails WP:V, WP:N. RGTraynor 14:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; no significant Google hits and it never shows up in the Unicode mailing lists. I can't really tell if it's meaningful when it's talking about Arabic, but it's basically meaningless when it comes to Unicode.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; 16 characters for Arabic pedaogical usage as proposed by Dr. Attash Durrani were indeed accepted at the May 2008 UTC meeting (although they have not yet been accepted by WG2), but the article misrepresents this as a Unicode endorsement of his 'Ghost Characters Theory', which it is not. It also suggests that these characters will be used to create characters productively, which they most certainly should not be. BabelStone (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Ghost Characters Theory is a concept of Font Programming which can be done with the help of Unicode support. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madzilde (talk • contribs) 18:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.