Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getamungstit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getamungstit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a student magazine has no independent reliable sources provided. The only external link is to the student union which formerly sponsored the magazine, but I don't see anything on that site about this magazine. I recommend deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, nothing showing up in google searches that appears useful either, Sadads (talk) 02:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.