Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetItRight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bangerz. If anyone feels there is any relevant content in the articles that can be merged (I'm not exactly hopeful of that), you are welcome to rescue the content from behind the redirects. Daniel (talk) 02:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GetItRight[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The articles fail WP:NSONGS. Most of the content of these articles are derived from album reviews/discussions. Live performances alone do not constitute notability unless the performances receive commentary/coverage on their own. Chart positions per-se also do not warrant notability. The one and only requirement for songs articles is third-party coverage, which these articles all lack (Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability.
If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created.) The only songs with (sort of) third-party coverage are "SMS (Bangerz)" and "Drive", but discussions regarding the former are about failed collaborations with Gwen Stefani and Nicki Minaj and not the song itself, and the latter are about speculations on her ex-boyfriend, which violates WP:SPECULATION. HĐ (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Similar AFDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maybe You're Right and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do My Thang. HĐ (talk) 10:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. HĐ (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bangerz per nom. The chart positions on Gaon and Pop Digital Songs aren't that notable. Coverage not outside album reviews. Ashley yoursmile! 15:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to Bangerz, since these songs have only received coverage as part of album reviews they fail WP:NSONGS. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Every song by every famous person doesn't warrant a Wiki entry, no? I don't see any reason this song needs a call-out anywhere, but if it does, it would be better on the Miley Cyrus page or the Bangerz page as Ashleyyoursmile suggests. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 21:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bangerz per nom. I do not see the point for every Miley Cyrus song to have its own article if they have no major third-party coverage outside album reviews, which fails WP:NSONGS. Neither is chart performance particularly notable enough. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.