Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gestell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Waggers (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gestell[edit]

Unsourced WP:OR essay on what appears to be a fringe topic in philosophy, and/or a WP:DICDEF. It does not help that the article is incomprehensible to the layman, and that the author isn't sure whether it's "Gestell" or "Gestall". Sandstein 16:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree that the article needs some work to bring it up to standard, but this is an important topic in the philosophy of technology. (Try an Internet search for "Gestell philosophy technology" if you want to see a large selection of articles on this concept.) The German article on Heiddegger has a substantial and apparently well-sourced section on Technology-as-Gestell [1]. Perhaps some of this material could be translated? --RichardVeryard (talk) 22:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick review reveals that there is plenty of source material available. GRBerry 15:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.