Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerwyn John

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Midland_Metro_rolling_stock#T-69. MBisanz ^talk 03:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gerwyn John[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An engineer who died young and had a single tram named after him by his employers. Sad, but I can't see any way in which he could possibly be notable. Looks a bit like a memorial/tribute page. Disputed PROD. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Maybe should be retitled 'Gerwyn John tram', per Wikipedia:Notability (people), 'only one notable event'. I can see how this article came about from the table in Midland_Metro_rolling_stock#T-69 in which he is the least notable person on the list. I don't know how or if this fits into Wikipedia guidelines, but the fact that his name is on a nameplate might lead people to seek information about him. --Derek Andrews (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Deserves mention in Midland_Metro_rolling_stock#T-69, but not a stand alone article. EricSerge (talk) 15:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge / Redirect over to Midland_Metro_rolling_stock#T-69 with the current article being deleted, given that the T-69 page can and should mention more about the late Mr. John but I don't think a full article necessarily is merited due to the lack of reliable source coverage CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect: I mean no disrespect, but unfortunately, I don't think the subject is notable enough for a stand alone article. A short passage could be added to the Midland Metro rolling stock#T-69 section/article, though, IMO. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.