Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerri Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE Mkdw ^talk 01:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gerri Davis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sadly, Gerri Davis might not meet our WP:ARTIST guidelines at this time. There has been some coverage of her on Artnet, but that's only one reliable secondary source that has written about her somewhat extensively that I have easily been able to find. The other sources are primary or mere mentions. While she has shown at some nice galleries, I can't find strong areas where she would pass ARTIST yet. Sadly, I think it might be WP:TOOSOON for her to be on Wikipedia. She has mere mentions in some notable and non notable sources, and then two articles about herself [1][2]. Perhaps those two are enough to pass GNG? I'm having a tough time making this call. SarahStierch (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I am not seeing any coverage in mainstream, reliable sources. Seems like WP:TOOSOON. If the creator would show any interest, we could userfy it, through it appears they are no longer interested in maintaining this topic. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.