Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Charles Ward
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Charles Ward[edit]
- Gerald Charles Ward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Subject is not notable. Not a general officer or anything. references are poor. Student7 (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Tom Reedy (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No outstanding achievements or awards. Only "reference" is a tribute by his son. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless there is significant additional notability above what is currently in the article. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The subject is not notable.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 02:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: doesn't satisfy guidance at WP:MILPEOPLE and my searches don't indicate notability in other regards. I'm happy to change my mind if someone can find some more sources that make clear this subject's notability. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Does not appear to meet any notablity standard. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.