Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geotech portfolio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geotech portfolio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Apparently the creator wants to write an article about one particular geotechnical sample and how it will be analyzed. I don't know why the article is titled "Geotechnical Portfolio" but from the header "James Huff - FGCU - Geothechnical Engineering 1 - Dr. Kunberger - CRN10385" this appears to be a school lab report or paper for the Geotechnical Engineering 1 course at Florida Gulf Coast University. We don't need the specifics of this particular sample, and anything else is already covered in articles such as Geotechnical engineering and Soil mechanics Meters (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this particular sample happened to have been of critical importance in some major civil engineering case, and there were reliable sources discussing the case and this sample's importance then I could see this being of interest to Wikipedia. Even then it would almost certainly just be an inclusion in the article about the case rather than a stand-along article about the sample. As it is, it is WP:OR about a trivial sample, and probably someone's schoolwork. Meters (talk) 04:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see how this is a valid topic for an encyclopedic article. Pichpich (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same as Pichpich. NOTAWWEBHOST as well. Legacypac (talk)
Delete unclear topic and does not pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 15:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not an encyclopedic topic. On the side, note creative use of "infobox settlement" :p --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm wondering if this was just supposed to be a joke. The cartoon File:PotatoArms.png with the quote "I'd rather be a potato farmer" does not look like a serious attempt at either a Wikipedia article or a school lab report. The article creator purposely added it to the article since it was not in the Sussex County, New Jersey article used as a template, and the editor modified the formatting of the image here [1] and has not touched the article since the potato farmer bit was deleted. Meters (talk) 20:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be similar to a project, falls under WP:NOTWEBHOST for this circumstance. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not amused. should probably just WP:CSD#g1 the thing as it is so much gabble. Dloh cierekim 22:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.