Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgios Vlachos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No deletion rationale provided. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Georgios Vlachos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page does not comply with Wikipedia's terms and conditions. Amir cheraghian (talk) 01:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism. Amir cheraghian (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 04:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism and Greece. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I’ve added three refs after a minimal search and there are obviously many more. The article needs more footnotes but the subject is the founder and long-term editor of Greece’s main conservative broadsheet newspaper so for anyone willing to put the time in that won’t be hard. Notability is beyond question though. Mccapra (talk) 09:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A prominent conservative and anti-liberal journalist, publisher and political commentator in inter-war Greece. Many Greek encyclopaedias and biographical lexicons have articles on him. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The nomination for deletion is too vague to justify removal of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:19, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly a figure of considerable historical interest, for whom sources are available. Amir cheraghian, Vaco98 would you care to clarify in what way this article fails to comply with Wikipedia's terms and conditions? Elemimele (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the argumets above. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the argumets above. Atchom (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article appears notable and has reliable sources too. Timetraveller80 (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per those above. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.