Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Spiropoulos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia Spiropoulos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no actual references Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added some references. The nominator should have done WP:BEFORE. Also notable as a knight of the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Biographies of living people have to have actual references. Rathfelder (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then they should be added. A lack of in-article sources is a poor justification for deletion when the subject is notable. And a lack of in-article sources doesn't exempt a nominator from WP:BEFORE. St★lwart¹¹¹ 02:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain and WP:BEFORE. St★lwart¹¹¹ 02:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain. Passes WP:GNG. Additionally, the foreign language wikis have other sources which can be used to prove notability and expand the article.4meter4 (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, is now clearly notable.Jackattack1597 (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain passes WP:GNG after WP:HEY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.