Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush cottaging controversy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. attack page, patent nonsense, take your pick. Also did some blocking. Morwen - Talk 12:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush cottaging controversy[edit]

This incident has not been WP:V, and even if true, may be unencyclopedic. Dryldram 12:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Its obviously not true since no news is cited a quick google search yields nothing. Gdo01 12:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete the article as vandalism and close this discussion, which is also an act of vandalism carried out by a sock puppet to avoid a speedy. -- IslaySolomon | talk 12:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDY - no cites, and without is a pesronal attack. Chris Kreider 12:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - unfortunately, this is a real life incident with consequences, deleting it would be wrong. Chill out man! --Pokerfoot 12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. MER-C 12:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge into George W. Bush, please use the GWB talk page to discuss this. It's notable, and verifiable. --Horbirre 12:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I hate to say "I told you so". If there's an admin around can they close this discussion please, lest it attract more spam from sock puppets. -- IslaySolomon | talk 12:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.