Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Trever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Trever (DD-339). (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Trever[edit]

George Trever (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mr. Trever doesn't appear to meet WP:SOLDIER. Dolotta (talk) 17:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. Need to move his bio to the ship named for him though, as the ship is inherently notable, and the information about the namesake is a notable part of the ship's history. Jinian (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jinian: Sounds like a good idea. Would closing this Afd as Merge be appropriate at this time? Dolotta (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (address) 17:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to USS Trever (DD-339); there's nothing to merge as the article does not cite any sources except to mention the Dictionary. The article history will in any case be preserved. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to USS Trever per K.e.coffman. Seems a valid search term, but doesn't seem sufficient for a stand alone article. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to USS Trever per K.e.coffman. Kierzek (talk) 13:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per coffman. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.