Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Smith (royal servant) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
George Smith (royal servant)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- George Smith (royal servant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contentious BLP that fails WP:BASIC. The article is hard to verify info, particularly since it allegation has been withdrawn. Fails WP:1E and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 16:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- delete per BLP considerations. As it stands it's entirely a coatrack for unsubstantiated claims about other people. Mangoe (talk) 18:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BASIC. I don't understand how this page was recreated after the previous AFD soft delete which only closed 5 days ago. Mztourist (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete he's dead, but the claims are BLPs and there's by far insufficient sourcing. SALT if needed to protect against re-creation, although a soft deletion has more leeway. Star Mississippi 16:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all I see is heresay with not enough sources. EmilySarah99 (talk) 08:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.