Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Rhodes ('Dusty')

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G3 (vandalism) by PeterSymonds. Non administrative closure. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Rhodes ('Dusty')[edit]

I came across this page a while ago, but only just today decided that I should try to move it to a more appropriate disambiguation. To do that effectively, however, I needed to get more information so that I could place an accurate qualifier within the brackets. I'm going to put myself and my poor Google searching ability on the line once again for this one. I believe this to be a hoax, as I could not find any information on a "George Rhodes" or "Dusty Rhodes" that has any of the traits claimed by this article, nor can I even find his book "Under the Oak Tree." If someone can provide sources, I might withdraw the nomination because he does seem to have at least some claim to notability (if he is indeed real), but I am not entirely certain that even that is strong enough. It also occurred to me that this may be a real person who was a relative of the original creator, but is otherwise non-notable, hence the reference to the book as being a "personal history". Cheers, CP 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G3 Blatant hoax. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.
Comment. I could not find an entry for Under the Oak Tree by this author at the British Library or Library of Congress. -- Eastmain (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.