Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George M. Moore Farmstead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George M. Moore Farmstead[edit]

George M. Moore Farmstead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm submitting this article for two reasons. (1) The preamble implies that the text is copied from a survey published by the Minnesota Historical Society.[1] Copyright must be assumed without evidence to the contrary. (2) Nothing in the text clues us into any significance the property might have, and virtually all of it is at a level of detail that is way beyond encyclopedic. I would try to make a decent stub out of it but I don't think there's sufficient noteworthy info in it for that. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also now just noticed a conflict of interest, in that the creator, User:Rvanderwoude, has identified himself as the owner of the property. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The farmstead is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (property #86003604 [2]). I will check the article out for copyright issues. The subject is notable even if the article has to be reduced to a stub. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep on national register. Dlohcierekim 01:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.