Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George L. Miles (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George L. Miles[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mentions, which are limited to local coverage of his retirement and pay cut, do not establish notability. Considered redirect to WQED, but no evidence of a notable tenure there. StarM 19:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is no where near enough to actually pass any reasonable reading of GNG. The last discussion was 14 years ago and a mass discussion. That this article survived then is a big reason of why Wikipedia is plagued with so many articles on non-notable people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Does not meet BLP requirements. Bezrat (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This subject does not rise to the level of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 03:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.