Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George King (Abercrombie)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy A7 by Anthony.bradbury. Non-admin closure. Tevildo (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
George King (Abercrombie)[edit]
- George King (Abercrombie) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A single purpose editor "Anfmodeling" has repeatedly removed speedy tags for this article, so I'm now bringing it for AFD and/or a speedy deletion and salt. IMHO, it qualifies as an A7 speedy -- Article has no references, and it appears this is pretty clearly a COI creation by the subject himself or his representative.
- Addendum - Said contributor has now attempted to blank this AFD. Additionally, the subject of this article has apparently also created an account and is trying to remove AFD templates from the article after warnings to C&D. Blocks may also be in order.
- Note: I've blocked User:Anfmodeling indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts, and blocked User:Ge0rgeking94 for 48 hours for repeatedly removing AfD templates. The article does vaguely assert some significance so I haven't A7ed it at this time but it's pretty borderline at best.~ mazca talk 14:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum - Said contributor has now attempted to blank this AFD. Additionally, the subject of this article has apparently also created an account and is trying to remove AFD templates from the article after warnings to C&D. Blocks may also be in order.
- Delete as non-notable. Being a model for a notable brand doesn't make one notable unless the model themself has received significant coverage. ~ mazca talk 14:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as spam. This article is almost more about the brand as it is the model. Neither has a place here. DarkAudit (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.