Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Goehl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

George Goehl[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are brief mentions of examples of articles. reddogsix (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable activist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -Coverage of the subject meets notability guidelines. Subject passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 05:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the coverage is pretty in-depth from good sources that I found online here such as The Guardian, The Nation, and The American Prospect. Frankly, it surprised me, since I'd never heard of him and I usually !vote detete for professional "activists". Bearian (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - looks notable to me based on the amount and depth of WP:RS - Scarpy (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article meet WP:GNG from coverages. Emily Khine (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the interviews don't satisfy GNG, and the American Prospect article is written by the subject. wumbolo ^^^ 10:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.