Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Galloway's appearance on Celebrity Big Brother (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If it can be proven to me that there is merge-worthy information in the article, it can be provided upon request. Wizardman 02:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Galloway's appearance on Celebrity Big Brother[edit]

This is a POV content fork. Wikipedia is not news, and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Above all, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. Last AfD had a consensus to merge, but this still hasn't happened several months later. Either include some of this information in George Galloway or Celebrity Big Brother 2006, or just get rid of it totally. Also, this is a lot less notable than the Celebrity Big Brother racism controversy as a stand-alone article.h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - if editors want to expand the prose in the main article they obviously can, however commentary of this nature isn't encyclopedic. Addhoc (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a tabloid. Tavix (talk) 22:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - merge useful stuff back to the George Galloway or Celebrity Big Brother 2006 articles.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - into George Galloway Doc Strange (talk) 14:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Doc Strange, but someone should actually do it this time. There should be some kind of rule about articles not merged following AFD consensus to merge. ^anemone│_projectors 18:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Big Brother has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.