Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georganne LaPiere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cher. There's no clear agreement to notability but I get the sense a redirect would be an acceptable compromise. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Georganne LaPiere[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable occasional actress and minor celebrity relative Orange Mike | Talk 00:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only one source, lack of information fails GNG. Hawkeye75 (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes NACTOR with multiple named roles. I'll go ahead and add them to the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (but a weak one) as per Megalibrarygirl with an in-depth source here, an acting mention here, but mostly the rest of the coverage is mentions of her in connection with her super-famous sister Cher or Michael Madsen (which slightly pushes her into the 'keep' column for me. If deleted, maybe merge to Cher.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the 2 Keep votes here are simply confirming the fact she has had background characters but nothing suggesting an obtained independent notable acting career. With this, none of the sourcing is actually persuasively suggesting anything for her own article. There's also no inherited notability from anyone else. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister, did you even look at her roles? She's had enough roles to pass NACTOR, especially for General Hospital. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 02:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability cannot be inherited. I hardly see any coverage to show that the subject is independently notable of Cher. Falling back on WP:NACTOR would require the subject to have "significant roles" in "multiple notable shows". I don't see any evidence of multiple notable roles. The only somewhat significant one is General Hospital, but even that was not a significant role. I also looked up and saw that she played the role for a short duration and another actress is more well known for playing that role for a longer time. None of the other roles I saw were anything close to significant. The subject doesn't pass GNG or WP:AUTHOR and considering that notability is not inherited, I would go for a delete. I'm OK with a redirect to Cher as well considering that previous AFDs of a similar nature such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ciccone (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Bogue have closed with a redirect. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 23:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 05:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ST and Lemongirl942's well-reasoned analysis. I would also be OK with a redirect to Cher. Neutrality^talk 19:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]