Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffroy Faugérolas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 15:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffroy Faugérolas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable filmmaker. Fails both WP:FILMMAKER and WP:BASIC. I could find a passing reference here, one interview on Lazydog Films (a blog), and another interview on Flickering Myth (which seems to be a blog as well), but this is insufficient under WP:BASIC: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Edcolins (talk) 13:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article created by Geothebg (talk · contribs), a WP:SPA who also created the now-deleted article for someone else of the same last name. "Nominations" - seemingly just showings at a film festival - are for local festivals anyway and do not add up to the level of significance we seek for nominations qualifying one for notability. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as the best results was simply links such as these here. SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Searches showed nothing to meet notability criteria as per WP:GNG, WP:FILMMAKER and WP:BASIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.