Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Zimmerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Zimmerman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reviews in reliable sources of self published book. Unnotable author. Green Cardamom (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article biography does not strongly indicate notability. If there was any, it would probably be through reception for his book, which appears to have been self-published in 2007 (Amazon ASIN B005D3J2IA) but I am finding nothing to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I just can't find enough to show that he's ultimately notable enough to merit an entry. That he was on the production staff of a notable show would be just enough to keep him from qualifying for a speedy delete, but that isn't enough to keep. The only thing I could find was this local paper that wrote about him, but since it's a local source it's greatly depreciated as far as notability goes and even if it wasn't, that's not enough to keep on. It's very, very rare that one source will be enough to keep an article on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Shows up on lots of self-published and non-reliable blogs and other sites, but establishing notability seems difficult (if not impossible). Maybe there's some some hardcopy interviews or something, but I'm not seeing any usable sources on Google. It can always be recreated later if reliable sources can be shown to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.