Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Trachtenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 08:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Trachtenberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, hi Seelie, we need a reason for this afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Sure thing, Coolabahapple--sorry. As I've mentioned in the edits of the page itself, I don't believe notability has been sufficiently established. This page was created for profit by a user who has been repeatedly blocked from editing because of non-disclosure of paid editing. Nevertheless, I gave it the benefit of the doubt and stuck a non-notability tag on the page. Seven months later, still *crickets*. Seelie (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

great, thanks. :) Coolabahapple (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 23:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. TJRC (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Little indication of notability. Fiachra10003 (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage by third party sources that show notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.