Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoLearning (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GeoLearning[edit]

GeoLearning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GeoLearning was previously nominated for deletion in 2010. The result was no consensus. GeoLearning does not meet Wikipedia's GNG. They have very minimal press coverage. Some of the sources on this article are first party sources. They have a few articles from unreliable third party sources, including a submission profile for an award that was written by company. Other than that, they have nothing. This a good example of unambiguous advertising or promotion. Additionally, the page creator and primary contributor of the page, User:Bencarstens is a SPA whose only contributions are for GeoLearning and Frank A. Russell (The CEO of GeoLearning). Sonstephen0 (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable and promotional DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - none of the references in the article establish notability as they are variously primary sources, not independent or catalogue entries. My own search turns up just a lot press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.