Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis Planet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Project Genesis. Davewild (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis Planet[edit]

This article is just plot repetition taken from the Star Trek movie articles and has no notability or referencing of its own. As such, its just plot repetition and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the Star Trek III page, or possibly change this to a dab page. Not sufficiently notable on its own but a reasonable search term. JJL (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the Star Trek III page. Mh29255 (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Project Genesis and source. There are quite a few Google Scholar hits on search terms such as genesis+planet+trek, but one article is sufficient. --Dhartung | Talk 22:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Dharthung. Rray (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect this and Genesis planet to Project Genesis. Don't delete as there are several incoming links. There is no need to keep the category:Star Trek planets on the redirect page, as List of Star Trek planets: G-L contains a brief but sufficient summary. - Fayenatic (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.