Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis3D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis3D[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game engine, fails WP:GNG. I have been able to find a handful of passing mentions of the sort as "This game uses Genesis3D", but that is all, and very few of those. Nothing that specifically discusses the engine that I can tell. -- ferret (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. While there are a few sources available, nothing qualifies as significant coverage. Lordtobi (✉) 14:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I found three sources via Google Books. Game Design Foundations by Roger E. Pedersen, Guide to Graphics Software Tools by Jim X. Chen, and 3D Game Art by Luke Ahearn (can't see the actual content, but I can see the index which shows that an entire chapter (Ch. 8) is dedicated to the article's subject). --MrClog (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Ahearn chapter looks compelling, at first glance, but hard to tell from the preview alone. czar 12:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.