Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genese Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genese Davis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With lots of unreliable sources, this person fails WP:NBIO. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a quick review of the sources shows substantial coverage in at least two good sources, this she passes. Can you be more specific as to what's wrong? Ordinary editing should be able to fix the problem you've identified. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar 09:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 09:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep However, article needs to go beyond a couple lists of accomplishments, as it looks more like a resume. Sources are hit and miss; Orange County Register is definitely ideal, but a passing mention in Bleeding Cool, not so much. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 03:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.