Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Next (programming block)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Next (programming block)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Generation Next was an umbrella term for a series of special reports on the BBC website and TV that lasted one week in 2006. Most media companies engage in this sort of grouped content series, and BBC runs several each year. This doesn't independently meet notability guidelines WP:GNG or WP:WEBCRIT as there are no secondary sources in the article (nor readily available) after over 12 years. It has no incoming links from any articles, either. -- Netoholic @ 18:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Netoholic @ 18:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A one-week series of BBC programs where all the references are primary (i.e. the BBC). Can't find any non-primary RS on google that this week of programming was in any way notable (probably why all the referencing in this article is from the BBC). Why would anyone want to read this article? Britishfinance (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Wikipedia is not a depository of random listings, especially if they are not notable. -The Gnome (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.