Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genecia Luo (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Current article identified as very poor, sources may be available but subject identifies BLP issues and requests deletion so given that the existing article lacks proper sources and nobody's rewritten from the available non-English sources, for now we are better off erring on the side of caution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JzG (talkcontribs) 17:48, 13 December 2013

Genecia Luo[edit]

Genecia Luo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page reads like a promotional webpage for the subject Genecia Luo Gluonman (talk) 15:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I agree that article has many problems. Most of the sourcing is junk and much of the content should be deleted. I found a good source, a chapter-length biography in the book The Audacity to Dream. It may take someone with access to Singapore (Chinese-language) sources to find more. -- GreenC 21:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:53, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.