Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemma Font

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The draftify votes are misguided, she won't become notable simply by playing, her club is not in a fullyprofessionalleague to satisfy nfooty. However, any editor who thinks they have found sources to satisfy gng can readily have the article restored to their draft space. Let me know if you want this done. Fenix down (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gemma Font[edit]

Gemma Font (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources in the article as well as this [1] all seem to indicate that she has not played a game of senior football yet. I also see no indication of being able to pass WP:GNG. At best, this seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON for Barcelona's third choice goalkeeper. Spiderone 18:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 22:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify since she might debut in the near future. SportingFlyer T·C 11:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify per SportingFlyer.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 04:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Looking at the reference available, person is not notable in her profession
  • Delete This article was already deleted (via prod) for failing WP:NFOOTY. Number 57 13:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Seems to be the best choice per above, no need to fully delete if she makes an appearance, as it will just have to be recreated once again. Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - draftify seems like a sensible option Spiderone 15:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Too many people are under the impression Font will be notable if she appears for Barcelona - she won't as she will still fail NFOOTBALL. Dougal18 (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.