Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geeta Mehta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geeta Mehta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found the opposite from nom's "Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online." A search also led me to the opposite of the nom's statement that the subject is a "Run-of-the-mill businesswoman." As an example of a search, the subject is included in a "who’s who of architects and thought leaders" in the 2017 full-length documentary Citizen Jane: Battle for the City. Also, in January 2019, the subject was named (but declined because of an upcoming election) by the Government of India as a recipient of the Padma Shri award for distinguished contribution to literature and education. The article has been cleaned up but still needs some work. As it stands now, however, with the reliable sources in the article that show notability, the subject easily passes WP:GNG as well as WP:SIGCOV. A "speedy keep" may be warranted. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEYMANN upgrade by User:AuthorAuthor.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not addressing the issue of promotion in the article, but clearly passes WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.