Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayle Manning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gayle Manning[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

politician, non notable before election, and has yet to take office, so has done nothing notable in office WuhWuzDat 16:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a clear case where someone will become notable by virtue of an office to be assumed, unless she should die between now and then, and even then I'd still argue for notability as the winner of an election to state-level office. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We'd just have to re-do the article in two months anyway; not sure what deletion would accomplish, exactly. Subject is notable under our criteria. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.