Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaylaxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 23:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gaylaxy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website; fails to meet WP:GNG. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article still needs cleanup, but the sources I added will let the article pass WP:GNG easily. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep due to quality and number of sources. Rab V (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good deal of secondary sources out there. WP:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP, but still the article could certainly be improved further. — Cirt (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.