Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gathering seafood by hand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Fishing techniques#Hand-gathering as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering seafood by hand[edit]

Gathering seafood by hand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears a combination of original research and lacking inline citations, except for its historical statement (which is also included and identically sourced at Fishing techniques#Hand-gathering). The title is phrased like a sentence, and is not used in its sources, making me believe a page move is necessary even if not deleted, but I don't know what the moved name would be. While particular types of hand gathering have their own articles which are listed at Fishing techniques#Hand-gathering, it is not clear if the umbrella topic of hand gathering seafood specifically is a notable grouping justifying its own article. If there were reliable sources reviewing the history of all or many hand fishing techniques together historically, then maybe this topic would be notable, but I cannot find such sources by a handful of google scholar searches. It is possible that sources for such a review may exist but are not easily accessible online.

My current recommendation is to blank and redirect to Fishing techniques#Hand-gathering as this section already covers the sourced historical statement and links in summary style to types of hand-gathering. There seems no other content to salvage and the proposed redirect would better organise the information in its existing summary style. Since this is possibly a controversial move and the talk page is inactive, I believe AfD is the most appropriate forum for establishing consensus first. Darcyisverycute (talk) 11:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.