Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gas Control Equipment Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. czar 03:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gas Control Equipment Ltd[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find much independent reporting on this company, leading me to think it's not notable. Additionally, the article is very promotional, which is fishy. There is a note in the talk page that the article was part of some project on a specific topic in the wiki and notable in that context, but that note is from 2006 and there does not appear to have been any work on that since (other than edits by others to make the article more promotional). Xnyarla (talk) 01:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. Xnyarla (talk) 01:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A product of the old age of Wikipedia, when notability was lax. Neither does it assert notability. SpacedFarmer (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article is heavy on superlative claims which would need strong references to remain. Noting the original comments on the Talk page, while sadly Anthony Appleyard cannot now comment, it may have been as Sabre Safety (later Sabre Medical) manufacturer that the present article was established. I am adding several Findsources below which may be useful (though I am just seeing product listings and announcements). AllyD (talk) 13:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GCE Group: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

GCE Sabre: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sabre Medical: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Everything I found was either not independent, a passing mention, or routing listings, e.g. Zoominfo (goes for both the company itself and the other three corporate entities that may have owned/absorbed it, posted in the last comment). WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Almost certainly WP:COI. Agreed, WeirdNAnnoyed. TLA (talk) 07:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.