The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.—Quarl(talk) 2006-12-27 09:27Z
Delete non notable, non verifiable Адам РайлиTalk 20:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, looks like a huge church with a rich tradition. Nomination reasons are rather exxagerated.--Ioannes Pragensis 21:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ioannes. Pastordavid 23:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per I.P. Edison 05:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
