Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Vandy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Deryck C. 16:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Gary Vandy[edit]
- Gary Vandy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: per rationale by Clarityfiend. Quis separabit? 13:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of the adequate notability. Arashtitan 14:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing to suggest better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 02:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.