Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Christopher Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by User:Friday. Yechiel Man 16:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Christopher Johnson[edit]

Unsourced article about an author without any evidence that the books are notable. Unable to verify the content. Contested prod. The creator's response to the prod warning makes me question the good faith of this contribution. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Looks very like vanity - see the initials of the main author of the article in question, GCJMcShane. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 10:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no google hits, no sources --h2g2bob (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:BIO. Should have gone on the prod in the first place. Martijn Hoekstra 11:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 0 sources, 0 Google hits on name, 0 Google hits on book. The book article Rune - The Story of Boann by the same editor was deleted and the editor made this post. Is that a threat of a DDOS attack if the editors creations are deleted? PrimeHunter 12:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per CSD A7. I might have just tagged it db-bio in the first place. Anakin 12:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete - not verifiable, not notable.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.