Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrett Immel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Garrett Immel[edit]

Garrett Immel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement only; the article resembles the yellow pages not an Encyclopedia. no Reliable sources Edit.pdf (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • No reliable sigcov found from my search Carpimaps talk to me! 11:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTRESUME. He has had some interesting jobs, but until reliable journalistic sources cover his career in significant ways, he's a working stiff like the rest of us and does not qualify for an encyclopedic article. If anyone is concerned about alternatives to deletion, he could possibly be redirected to his band Ghastly Ones. but I'm not so sure about their notability either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I looked into his band and decided that they are worthy of a deletion discussion as well. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghastly Ones. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.