Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garjana - A fight against rape

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Garjana - A fight against rape[edit]

Garjana - A fight against rape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, very few Google results. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Jinkinson talk to me 13:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 12:17, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I tried to see if I could find any evidence of notability, I did not succeed Ottawakismet (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC)][reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete per this article being TOO SOON. I spent a few moments straightening up the article, and while some of the principals are notable, this has not resulted in this as-yet-unreleased film receiving the requisite coverage to make it an exception under WP:NFF (paragraph 3).[1] Okay to userfy it back to its author until coverage is forthcoming. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.