Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gao Hengjun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gao Hengjun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this meets Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Page history suggests possible self-promotion or fan club. Lots of publications, but I don't think he is lead author on any. Derek Andrews (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Few cites on GS. Looks like too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as non-notable. -- Scray (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-- He appears to have many patented inventions[1] and has co-authored many published research papers [2] Does he meet WP:PROF??-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not unless they are cited. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.