Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ganool[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable torrent site, doesn't read like an article, no RS. PrussianOwl (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO, no indication of significance. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:WEBCRIT. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I honestly agree that it is not notable enough and does not have enough coverage. (Note it is not a torrent site) Mosaicberry (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: verging on {{db-web}} territory. SITH (talk) 22:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with any other connected websites for unambiguous spam. "The site has gone through possibly over one hundred domains." nuff said. Graywalls (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you even mean lol Mosaicberry (talk) 23:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was a quote from the article. If it's true, this is just another iteration of the domains they have been going through which lowers the justification for having a page for this domain. Graywalls (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a page on the website, not the domain, have you even read the page?

In addition, what do you mean by 'Delete any other connected websites for unambiguous spam'? Mosaicberry (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not have enough courage. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete per WP:SNOW.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.