Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganga puja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga puja[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability Kevin McE (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was WP:BEFORE done? [1], [2], [3], [4] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks notable based on the above-cited sources. Obviously, article needs to be expanded and sourced, but it ought to be salvaged, not sunk. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Good job User:Nvvchar. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Poor nomination. I suggest a speedy withdraw @Kevin McE: to save yourself from further embarrassment.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - The article meets the general notability guidelines. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.