Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Epsilon Omega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 01:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Epsilon Omega[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable club with only 1 chapter nationwide. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG standards of notability. Insufficient third party sources to establish notability. GrapedApe (talk) 01:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, although it does not appear that the single chapter Asian American fraternity does not pass WP:N & WP:ORG, as stated by the nominator, the concept of minority based fraternities is probably a notable subject within itself, and as such what content is here can be included in a List article, and a redirect left in its place.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources at all; article is pretty bare bones. Could be redirected to University of Southern California#Traditions and student activities, although it is not mentioned there (the "Greek life" subsection does not name individual clubs). --MelanieN (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would not be opposed to a merger of verified content and redirect to said section.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser ^(TSU) 14:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we don't need an article for every little asian boy card play club on campusLuciferWildCat (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to strike the racist comment? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone has more luck than editors have to date in finding some significant reliable sources. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.